The House of Commons Agriculture and Agri-Food Committee met on May 7, 2026, to study business risk management (BRM) programs. Witnesses included representatives from Coop Agrobio du Québec, Global Ag Risk Solutions, the National Cattle Feeders' Association, the Canada Organic Trade Association, Canadian Organic Growers, and the Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Growers.
Guillaume Camirand and Marianne Bergeron of Coop Agrobio du Québec said BRM programs are poorly suited to organic producers, citing issues such as the requirement for four contiguous hectares of damage to trigger crop insurance, insured values below actual contract prices, and AgriStability calculations that penalize growing or transitioning farms. They recommended lowering AgriStability thresholds, raising AgriInvest contribution rates to 1.5%, insuring at real contract value, and providing targeted support during the three-year organic transition period, while noting that Quebec’s success in organic farming stems from structured provincial programs and a network of specialized agronomists.
David Sullivan of Global Ag Risk Solutions argued that Canada’s BRM framework does not extend federal risk backstops or premium subsidies to qualified private insurance products, even when they cover risks public programs miss, such as margin and parametric coverage. He recommended amending AgriStability to allow enterprise-level accounting, establishing a federal reinsurance backstop for approved private products with portable premium subsidies, and creating a structured pathway for private insurers to submit new products for approval, emphasizing this would complement rather than replace provincial Crown corporations.
Janice Tranberg and Brad Deleeuw of the National Cattle Feeders’ Association said BRM programs are not flexible, timely, or bankable for cattle feeders, with the AgriStability payment cap of $3 million unchanged for 20 years and quickly reached by large feedlots. They recommended increasing the AgriStability cap to $15 million with reviews every five years, piloting a whole-farm revenue insurance program, making livestock price insurance a permanent subsidized national program, and permanently raising the advance payment program interest-free portion to $350,000, while highlighting that a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in southern Alberta could devastate 25% of Canada’s beef production.
Tia Loftsgard and Scott Shiels of the Canada Organic Trade Association said Canada is losing organic producers and acres, forcing processors to import supply and weakening the food system, with programs like AgriStability penalizing organic farmers through artificially depressed reference margins and inconsistent pricing benchmarks. They recommended allowing contract pricing in insurance models, improving AgriStability for crop rotation and transition timelines, updating AgriRecovery to recognize certification loss as a multi-year risk, and investing in organic transition programs and research, noting that Saskatchewan’s tailored organic insurance covers only 29% of organic acres versus 82.5% of conventional acres.
Katie Fettes and Gillian Flies of Canadian Organic Growers said BRM programs should shift from reactive risk management toward proactive risk reduction, with organic farming embedding resilience through reduced input dependence and soil health, but the transition period carries risks farmers bear alone. They recommended recognizing resilience as a core policy objective, ensuring BRM programs account for organic prices and practices, de-risking the organic transition with targeted support and technical assistance, investing in research and advisory services, and strengthening domestic organic processing capacity, noting that the U.S. spends eight times more per acre on organic programs than Canada.
Richard Lee of the Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Growers said BRM programs were designed for traditional yield and weather risks and do not cover the business disruptions greenhouse growers face from trade volatility, energy cost spikes, labour shortages, and pest incursions. He called for extending AgriInsurance to greenhouse crops with controlled-environment criteria, improving AgriStability and AgriInvest for predictable support, strengthening AgriRecovery for rapid response to non-traditional risks, modernizing plant health risk management, and advancing a coordinated North American pest strategy, noting that 85% of production is exported to the U.S. and pests can enter via imported produce.
The committee also discussed trade risks, with witnesses from the cattle and organic sectors expressing concerns about the Mercosur agreement and U.S. tariffs, and the need for better data on organic exports. There was no procedural debate, motions, or votes during this portion of the meeting.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.