The House of Commons Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food met to study the implementation of the grocery code of conduct. Witnesses included Karen Proud, President and Adjudicator of the Office of the Grocery Sector Code of Conduct; Patrice Léger Bourgoin and Catherine Lefebvre from the Association des producteurs maraîchers du Québec; Michael Graydon from Food, Health & Consumer Products of Canada; and Massimo Bergamini from the Fruit and Vegetable Growers of Canada.
Karen Proud reported that her office is fully operational with nearly 100 members, and its top priority is finalizing the dispute resolution management process (DRMP) before the code's full implementation on January 1, 2026. She noted that major retailers like Loblaws, Walmart, and Costco have not yet signed on, as they are waiting to see the final DRMP, but she expects them to join once it is complete. Proud emphasized that the code is voluntary and does not address food prices or inflation, and that her main enforcement tool is public reporting of non-compliance, as she cannot impose fines or compel evidence.
Patrice Léger Bourgoin described persistent market failures, including retailers undervaluing production costs, imposing administrative fees, and engaging in questionable behaviours like charging fees to unload trucks. He argued that producer associations must be allowed to file formal complaints on behalf of members regarding systemic issues, as individual producers fear retaliation and lack resources. Catherine Lefebvre provided examples of retailers threatening reprisals, demanding two-year price guarantees, and requesting confidential competitor information, calling the current business climate toxic and unsustainable for family farms.
Michael Graydon, chair of the code's board, stated that the code's core provisions are complete and the DRMP is the final piece, with discussions ongoing. He cautioned against formalizing the role of associations in the dispute process, warning it could create confidentiality and slippery-slope issues, and argued that the code's effectiveness should be evaluated after implementation rather than based on current retailer behaviour. He expressed confidence that a workable DRMP will be reached and that the code can be implemented by January 2026.
Massimo Bergamini argued that the code's design has a fundamental flaw: it relies on individual suppliers bringing complaints, which is impractical given growers' limited resources and fear of retaliation. He proposed allowing credible producer associations to file representative systemic complaints, akin to a class action, to aggregate evidence and reduce risk for growers. Bergamini stressed that without this change, the code risks being underused or overwhelmed, and urged the committee to support amendments to the code's operating rules to enable this.
The committee also debated and unanimously agreed to a motion by John Barlow to undertake a separate study on the fraudulent importation of broiler meat mislabelled as spent fowl, with a report to be presented to the House.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.