The House of Commons International Trade Committee met on February 10, 2026, to study Bill C-18, which would implement the Canada-Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). Witnesses included Ian Lee (Associate Professor, Carleton University), Jason Easton (AtkinsRéalis), Michael Harvey (Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance), Stuart Trew (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives), Jorge Correa (Canadian Meat Council), Brian Innes (Soy Canada), and Claire Citeau (Canadian Meat Council).
Ian Lee argued that globalization is not dead, citing recent trade data showing continued growth in global exports and imports, and that Canada cannot replace its trading relationship with the United States due to geographic and economic realities. He recommended that Canada focus on its comparative advantages in natural resources, energy, critical minerals, services, and agriculture, while being skeptical of large-scale manufacturing ambitions, and urged the government to address domestic infrastructure and interprovincial trade barriers to support export diversification.
Jason Easton supported the CEPA as a tool to improve market access, regulatory transparency, and investment certainty for Canadian firms in Indonesia, particularly in nuclear energy, where Canada’s CANDU technology offers opportunities. He noted that the agreement alone does not deliver projects but creates an enabling environment, and that Canadian companies benefit from government-to-government relationships and trade missions to compete against rivals like China and Russia.
Michael Harvey welcomed the CEPA, stating that Indonesia’s large and growing middle class represents a significant market for Canadian agri-food exports, and that the agreement’s commitments on biotechnology and trade facilitation are innovative. He emphasized that the agreement builds trust and helps resolve non-tariff barriers through regulatory co-operation, and that Canadian and Indonesian agri-food products are largely complementary rather than competitive.
Stuart Trew criticized the CEPA for including investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), which he argued interferes with human rights and climate policy, does not increase investment flows, and exposes governments to costly lawsuits. He also objected to the digital trade chapter, saying it copies U.S. big-tech-friendly rules that undermine regulation, and noted that labour and environmental protections in the agreement are weak and unenforceable, recommending that Canada adopt enforceable labour mechanisms like the USMCA’s rapid response model.
Jorge Correa supported the CEPA as a significant step for Canadian meat exports, noting that Indonesia imports $1.1 billion in beef and that Canada currently has no access to that market. He stressed the importance of securing timely, predictable conditions on the ground, including halal certification and plant listing, and highlighted that the real test will be whether negotiated access translates into commercially viable trade.
Brian Innes described Indonesia as a top market for Canadian soybeans, with the CEPA eliminating tariffs that could rise to 27% and creating new mechanisms to address non-tariff barriers like sanitary and phytosanitary issues. He urged the government to make use of the bilateral dialogue on SPS issues to promote science-based residue limits, and noted that the agreement provides options and risk management for producers facing geopolitical uncertainty, including from China.
Claire Citeau, appearing via video from Singapore, emphasized the importance of renewing the CUSMA to maintain tariff-free trade with the United States and Mexico, and noted that the meat sector is working closely with negotiators and Mexican colleagues to protect current terms.
The committee also heard exchanges where members questioned witnesses on topics including the feasibility of replacing U.S. trade, the role of infrastructure in export diversification, and the risks of forced labour and deforestation in Indonesia. No procedural debate, motions, or votes were recorded in the transcript.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.