Roopa Desai Trilokekar
Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, York University, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Thank you so much for this opportunity—
Meeting 7 · October 9, 2025 · 15:32–17:25 (1h 53m)
45-16 witnesses · 196 interventions · 13,363 words
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration studied the international student program, hearing from five witnesses: Roopa Desai Trilokekar, an associate professor at York University; John Tibbits, president of Conestoga College; Rob Kristofferson, president of the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations; Lisa Brunner, a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of British Columbia; and Jason Jacques, interim Parliamentary Budget Officer, with Caroline Nicol.
Roopa Desai Trilokekar recommended delinking international education from immigration and labour market policy, arguing that the current linkage has created conflicting messages and enabled exploitation. She urged Canada to learn from policy mistakes in other countries, such as Australia, and to reinvest in international students as a soft power resource for public diplomacy, rather than as a solution to domestic problems.
John Tibbits stated that Conestoga College’s growth in international enrolment was aligned with federal, provincial, and municipal policies encouraging immigration to address labour shortages, and that the college invested in housing and student supports. He acknowledged challenges but defended the college’s role in meeting regional labour needs, and disagreed with characterizations that the region is in a mess, noting that all students found housing.
Rob Kristofferson said that universities turned to international students for revenue due to declining provincial funding, and that international students have subsidized the education of additional domestic students. He called for predictable, coordinated federal-provincial policy on study permit numbers, and recommended that any increases be tied to institutions’ ability to provide housing and student services, while noting that bad actors are primarily outside the university sector.
Lisa Brunner described the international student program as a disjointed policy arena lacking multi-level coordination, and urged forward-looking, systems-thinking planning. She recommended rigorous, publicly accessible reporting on how tuition revenue is used for student supports, and clearer, more predictable pathways to permanent residency to reduce precarity and exploitation, while cautioning against scapegoating international students for structural issues like housing.
Jason Jacques and Caroline Nicol presented the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s estimate that the 2025-2027 immigration levels plan will reduce nominal GDP by about $37 billion on average over three years, due to fewer hours worked and reduced consumption. They noted that the office has not been asked to analyze the impact of international student policy changes on health care, housing, or social infrastructure, but would be open to undertaking such work upon a committee request.
The committee also heard from members, with Conservative members questioning Tibbits on the impact of Conestoga’s growth on housing, youth unemployment, and community services, and suggesting that the federal government did not tie permit numbers to housing or job availability. Liberal members focused on the role of provincial funding and the need for coordination, while a Bloc Québécois member raised questions about federal transfer cuts and jurisdictional issues. No procedural debate, motions, or votes were recorded during this meeting.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.
Roopa Desai Trilokekar
Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, York University, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Thank you so much for this opportunity—
John Tibbits
President, Conestoga College
Opening remarks
Chair and honourable members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. The committee's study comes at a pivotal moment for Canada's international student program. Colleges, including Conestoga, have been subject to scrutiny about the role internationals play in housing, affordability and community pressures. I welcome the opportunity to reaffirm that Conestoga's approach has always been about service. Our mission has always been to ensure that the communities we serve have access to the skilled labour force they need to survive. We are one of Ontario's leading polytechnical institutes and we serve about 20,000 students in Waterloo, Kitchener, Cambridge, Guelph, Brantford, Milton, Stratford and Ingersoll. This is a catchment area that comprises more than 1.2 million people. It's actually one of the economic engines of Canada and is expected to grow substantially over the next 20 years. We specialize in applied learning, industry partnerships and applied research, with recognized strengths in advanced manufacturing, skilled trades, health sciences, engineering, business and information technology. For decades—at least 30 years—Conestoga's…
Rob Kristofferson
President, Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations
Opening remarks
Hello, and thank you for the opportunity to speak today. OCUFA seeks a sustainably funded university system that educates the best and the brightest. This does not mean using international students as ATMs. OCUFA has supported the decision to impose restrictions on the number of international students admitted to Canadian post-secondary institutions, but we hold that improvements can be made to ensure that the international students Canada accepts are supported to thrive. Better coordination between the federal and provincial governments on this issue is needed. The study permit restrictions were suddenly imposed, leaving the universities and provinces to scramble. We need predictable, coordinated policy to allow for long-term planning, not reactive shifts. Universities aggressively pursued international students, not because of a lack of domestic students but because they needed revenue. International students have not taken away seats from domestic students; they have supported the education of additional domestic students. Ontario caps the number of funded domestic students, but many universities go above these caps to educate more domestic students. International tuition…
Lisa Brunner
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of British Columbia, Centre for Migration Studies, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Thank you to the chair and to the committee for this opportunity. I am joining you from the traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Musqueam people, where the University of British Columbia centre for migration studies is located. I am a postdoctoral research fellow. I am appearing as an academic expert and not as a representative of the institution. Explaining the systemic issues within the international student program is not a simple task, and I don't think the actors can be neatly sorted into victims, villains and victors. I did submit to the committee a report published yesterday by the Centre of Excellence on the Canadian Federation, which outlines my assessment of the program in detail. Today, I am just going to highlight a few points that have not been raised much, so far. Since World War II, the recruitment of international students has been framed as a solution to many different Canadian policy problems. First, it was framed as a soft power vehicle and a form of international development and aid, as we heard from Dr. Trilokekar. Then, in the 1980s, it was an export industry to generate funds through differential tuition and later as a source of highly…
Jason Jacques
Interim Parliamentary Budget Officer, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Opening remarks
Thanks for inviting us. I'm here with Caroline Nicol. She's our expert in demography and immigration in the office. In January 2025, we published “Impact assessment of the 2025-2027 Immigration Level Plan”. We estimate that the government's “new immigration targets [will] reduce nominal GDP” by about $37 billion “on average over the next three years.” We would be pleased to respond to any questions you may have regarding our analysis of the 2025-27 immigration level plan or other PBO work. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Caroline Nicol
Advisor-Analyst, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
Opening remarks
The way that affects the Canadian economy is that, for one thing, fewer hours are worked. Essentially, there are fewer people available for work and fewer hours worked. That automatically affects the country's economic activity. Another aspect to consider is consumption. Fewer people will consume different products, and that also reduces economic activity.