The House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry and Technology (INDU) met on June 8, 2026, to study fraud and online scams. Witnesses included David Shipley from Beauceron Security, Jennifer Quaid from the Canadian Cyber Threat Exchange, Jon Camfield and Rachel Curran from Meta Platforms Inc., Nicholas Giurietto from the Australian Banking Association Inc., and David Pegley from the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange Ltd.
David Shipley argued that online platforms, particularly Meta, profit from scam ads and should be held liable for them. He recommended a 24-hour cooling-off period for suspicious transactions, shared responsibility among platforms, banks, and customers, and better resourcing of the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre. He urged the committee to investigate whether Meta knowingly profited from fraud, citing a Reuters report that Meta expected $16 billion globally from scam ads.
Jennifer Quaid emphasized the need for a whole-of-society approach to fraud, treating it as part of a broader cybercrime and money-laundering ecosystem. She called for legislative frameworks to enable timely information sharing across sectors, noting that current silos and outdated regulations hinder collaboration. She stressed that prevention must be the primary objective, with real-time transaction intervention and network-level disruption.
Jon Camfield stated that Meta takes fraud seriously, enforcing against over 10 million scam-linked accounts and removing 159 million scam ads globally in 2025. He advocated for a whole-of-ecosystem approach, strong information-sharing frameworks with safe harbour protections, and outcomes-focused regulation. He disagreed with Shipley’s characterization of Meta’s revenue from scams, saying the 10% figure was a misrepresentation and that actual numbers were lower and declining.
Rachel Curran defended Meta’s tax compliance in Canada and its efforts to reduce scams, noting a 50% reduction in scam ad reports. She disagreed with Shipley’s suggestion that Meta’s motivation was tied to news publisher compensation, and she confirmed that Meta cannot share Canadian news content due to the Online News Act, even for fraud prevention articles.
Nicholas Giurietto described Australia’s scam prevention framework, which requires banks, telcos, and digital platforms to take equivalent but sector-specific actions to prevent, detect, and respond to scams. He stressed the importance of cross-industry data sharing and noted that placing the burden solely on banks is ineffective, as scams begin upstream. He said the framework is still being implemented but has already encouraged collaboration.
David Pegley explained that the Australian Financial Crimes Exchange facilitates intelligence sharing across eight industries, including banking, telcos, and digital platforms. He noted challenges in building trust among competing sectors and identifying relevant data attributes for each. He highlighted the importance of real-time sharing to stop funds from flowing offshore and to support law enforcement after the fact.
During questioning, members pressed Meta on its responsibility for scams, with some accusing the company of profiting from fraud and blocking useful news content. Meta representatives defended their efforts, citing $30 billion spent on safety and security over a decade. Shipley and Quaid reiterated the need for platform accountability and prevention-focused measures. The Australian witnesses emphasized that a coordinated, multi-sector approach is essential, and that Canada should avoid a bank-only liability model. No procedural debate, motions, or votes were recorded in the transcript.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.