Caroline Levesque
Early Childhood Educator, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Mr. Chair and members of the committee, my name is Caroline Levesque, and I am David's mother. I am an early childhood educator.
Meeting 31 · May 27, 2026 · 16:42–18:01 (1h 19m)
45-13 witnesses · 70 interventions · 9,903 words
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights met to study Bill C-231, an Act to amend the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which aims to replace punitive approaches with early intervention focused on treatment and mental health for young people. The witnesses were Caroline Levesque, an early childhood educator and David's mother; Justine Berthold, a nurse and David's sister; and Angy Riendeau, a criminologist.
Caroline Levesque and Justine Berthold, speaking jointly, described how their son and brother David died by suicide in February 2025 after struggling with addiction and mental health issues. They argued that the justice system focuses on the offence rather than the underlying suffering, and that Bill C-231 would give judges, police, and other stakeholders real tools to refer young people to treatment programs before situations worsen. They asked the committee to support the bill, stating that if it helps just one young person or prevents one tragedy, it will have done its job.
Angy Riendeau, a criminologist, expressed sympathy for the family but cautioned that establishing substance abuse as a problem requiring treatment must be paired with careful expert assessment. She noted that most teens arrested are released without access to comprehensive assessments that would inform needs-based measures, and that the real problem is a lack of resources, not a lack of legislative tools. She pointed out that the Youth Criminal Justice Act already provides intervention options, such as conferences under section 19 and treatment orders under section 91, but these are underutilized. She disagreed with the premise that changing the law alone is the solution, arguing that without investments in specialized assessments, community services, and support for families, the bill's goals will not be achieved.
The committee then proceeded to clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-231. The sponsor, MP Luc Berthold, moved several amendments, including broadening the bill's scope from "addiction treatment" to "problematic substance use treatment program," allowing extrajudicial sanctions to include such programs, and permitting a youth justice court to delay sentencing to enable attendance at a treatment program with the consent of the Attorney General and the young person. All amendments were adopted on division, and the bill, as amended, was reported to the House without further debate.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.
Caroline Levesque
Early Childhood Educator, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Mr. Chair and members of the committee, my name is Caroline Levesque, and I am David's mother. I am an early childhood educator.
Justine Berthold
Nurse, As an Individual
Opening remarks
My name is Justine Berthold. I am a nurse and David's younger sister.
Angy Riendeau
Criminologist, As an Individual
Opening remarks
Mr. Chair and members of the committee, let me first say that I sympathize with what MP Luc Berthold, his wife, Caroline Levesque, and their family have been going through since their son's death in February 2025. As someone who works with youth and families, I fully understand the desire to do something so that others won't have to experience what they did. No one can oppose legislation that seeks to provide young people with better support at such a complex stage of development as adolescence. We all want the same thing: to protect young people before they get caught up in delinquent behaviour, develop addiction or become marginalized. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that establishing substance abuse as a risk factor or problem that requires treatment has to go hand in hand with careful expert assessment. The reality is that most teens who are arrested are released on a promise to appear or summons. They will never have access to the comprehensive assessment that will inform the court as to the needs-based measures it should impose. That is the real problem, as far as I'm concerned. It is equally important to keep in mind that we shouldn't just intervene quickly when…