The House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources met on November 6, 2025, to study the forestry industry, hearing from nine witnesses representing industry associations, producers, and forest owners from across Canada.
Kim Haakstad, President and CEO of the BC Council of Forest Industries, described British Columbia as the highest-cost forestry jurisdiction in North America, with mills closing due to 45% combined U.S. duties and tariffs. She called for a coordinated federal-provincial work plan focused on a fair softwood lumber agreement, faster access to federal support programs through a single-window approach, and regulatory and permitting reform to eliminate duplication between federal and provincial systems.
Bruce St.John, President of the Canada Wood Group, emphasized the importance of diversifying export markets away from the United States, noting that offshore exports from 2015 to 2024 contributed nearly $20 billion to Canada’s GDP. He requested consistent, long-term government funding for market development, as programs take years to develop and the industry cannot increase its own funding in current market conditions.
Andrew Rielly, Board Chair of the Independent Wood Processors Association of BC, stressed the critical urgency facing small and medium-sized value-added companies, warning that 20 of his 60 member companies could close by the end of the first quarter without support. He proposed two options: including softwood in broader trade negotiations with the U.S., or having the federal government buy the duty deposits held at the border to provide liquidity, noting his company alone has paid over $13 million.
Jason Krips, Co-Chair of the Alberta Softwood Lumber Trade Council, underscored that combined duties and tariffs of approximately 50% are causing mill curtailments and layoffs, and that once jobs leave remote communities they are hard to recover. He called for a durable agreement with the U.S., a seat for industry at the negotiating table, and federal legislation requiring wood use in federally procured projects nationwide.
Andrew de Vries, CEO of Canadian Forest Owners, and Vincent Miville, Vice-Chair, highlighted that private forest owners are collateral victims of the softwood dispute, excluded from support programs despite supplying 20% of Canada’s forestry production. They recommended exempting lumber from private lands from trade penalties, creating a personal silvicultural savings and investment plan similar to an RRSP, and ensuring federal legislation like the Species at Risk Act prioritizes Crown land for critical habitat measures.
Luc Thériault, President of Wood Products at Domtar Inc. and Co-Chair of the Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance, stated that the industry is more aligned than ever but faces one of the most complex regulatory systems in the world. He supported efforts to access the over $11 billion Canadian held by U.S. Customs, noting that Domtar alone has approximately $1 billion tied up, and called for faster, more flexible government programs to support investment and maintain jobs.
Ian Dunn, President and CEO of the Ontario Forest Industries Association, reported that Ontario has seen dramatic consolidation in pulp and paper, with only three mills operating compared to 16 in 2005, and recent sawmill curtailments affecting communities like Ear Falls where 15% of the population was laid off. He argued for a national response to the lumber dispute and highlighted opportunities in wood-based energy systems, such as biomass electricity generation, though he noted Ontario ranks poorly in that area.
Brad Thorlakson, Executive Chairman of Tolko Industries Ltd., noted that this trade dispute is different because Canada now has the least competitive access to U.S. markets while European competitors enter at lower duties, displacing Canadian supply. He stressed that a negotiated solution is essential to allow reinvestment and growth, and that the U.S. cannot quickly become self-sufficient, needing 55 new sawmills to replace Canadian production.
The committee also heard from members of Parliament who questioned witnesses on topics including the need for a softwood deal, the impact of tariffs on communities, and the effectiveness of government programs. Procedural debate occurred when a Conservative member made a personal allegation against the Prime Minister, which was ruled out of order by the Chair.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.