The House of Commons Transport, Infrastructure and Communities committee studied Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, which aims to eliminate federal internal trade barriers and accelerate major nation-building projects. Appearing were ministers Freeland, LeBlanc and Alty, along with Privy Council Office officials and 16 witnesses from business, labour, indigenous and environmental groups.
Ministers Freeland, LeBlanc and Alty argued the bill is an urgent response to U.S. tariffs, would remove federal barriers to trade and labour mobility, and would create a streamlined process for projects of national interest while respecting provincial jurisdiction and constitutional obligations to consult indigenous peoples. Officials Sarah Jackson and Christiane Fox detailed controls on ministerial powers to exempt projects from laws, and the planned major projects office to coordinate federal approvals.
Helena Sonea and Rob Cunningham of the Canadian Cancer Society warned that part 1 of the bill could allow weaker provincial health and environmental standards to override stronger federal ones, citing asbestos and tobacco, and recommended a general health and environment exception. Sabaa Ahmad Khan of the David Suzuki Foundation called both parts of the bill an unprecedented threat to indigenous sovereignty and environmental law, urging amendments to make project criteria mandatory and to require public consultation.
David Chartrand of the Manitoba Métis Federation supported the bill’s intent but stressed that Canada must consult legitimate rights-holding governments, not organizations, and called for clarity on the indigenous advisory council’s role. Grand Chief Trevor Mercredi of Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta rejected the bill, saying Canada violated its duty to consult by giving nations less than a week’s notice, and demanded explicit recognition of treaty rights, revenue sharing and free, prior and informed consent.
Finn Johnson of the Carpenters’ Regional Council and Steven Schumann of the International Union of Operating Engineers supported the bill’s goal of accelerating projects and labour mobility, but urged amendments to protect Canadian jobs, expand the Red Seal standard, and require community benefit agreements with apprenticeship targets. Jeffrey Cyr of Raven Indigenous Outcomes Funds endorsed the bill as an opportunity for economic reconciliation, arguing that early, deep engagement with communities leads to better investment outcomes.
Chief Sheldon Sunshine of Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation rejected the bill entirely, saying it would cause litigation by bypassing treaty rights and allowing projects to proceed without meaningful consent or accommodation. Michael Hatch of the Canadian Credit Union Association said the bill does not address barriers facing provincially regulated credit unions seeking to operate nationally, and urged a shorter, clearer path to federal regulation.
Lauren Martin of the Canadian Meat Council supported the bill’s intent but warned that deeming provincial meat inspection equivalent to federal standards would risk food safety and international trade relationships, and recommended that provincial facilities meet federal standards before being allowed to trade interprovincially. Chief Lance Haymond of Kebaowek First Nation opposed the bill, calling it a blueprint for division that ignores constitutional obligations and invites legal challenges, and urged the removal of the Indian Act from the list of laws that could be overridden.
Heather Exner-Pirot of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute said the bill is an imperfect but useful shortcut that signals a change in government priorities, but warned it lets ministers pick winners and losers and cannot replace the hard work of reforming the underlying regulatory system for all projects.
The committee then conducted clause-by-clause consideration, adopting amendments including NDP-13 to add unionized labour to the preamble, CPC-26 to require a public registry of projects, CPC-27 to require a national security review of foreign investments, and CPC-11 as amended to list several acts that cannot be exempted. Several Bloc amendments were also adopted, including BQ-25 to require provincial consent for projects, BQ-26 to require provincial consent for conditions, and BQ-37 to require provincial consent for exemptions. The chair ruled NDP-36 inadmissible as it would impose a charge on the treasury. The committee adopted the bill as amended.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.