The House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage met to study the impact of artificial intelligence on the creative sector. Witnesses included representatives from Access Copyright, the Association of Canadian Publishers, the Canadian Authors Association, Work in Culture, the Fédération culturelle canadienne-française, and Meta Platforms Inc.
Erin Finlay of Access Copyright argued that AI training engages creators' exclusive rights and requires licences, not new copyright exceptions. She recommended a voluntary licensing market with transparency obligations for AI platforms, noting that this model is already emerging in other countries. She disagreed with the idea that AI training does not implicate copyright.
John Illingworth of the Association of Canadian Publishers said AI developers have misappropriated copyrighted works at an industrial scale, citing recent U.S. settlements. He urged no new copyright exceptions and called for compensation for past, present and future use, plus investments to help Canadian-owned publishers compete with larger firms using in-house AI tools.
Travis Croken of the Canadian Authors Association warned that AI can mimic an author's voice and flood the market, undermining cultural diversity and creators' livelihoods. He recommended that copyright remain for human creators only, with consent, fair compensation and transparency as core principles.
Diane Davy of Work in Culture presented research showing 79% of creative professionals use AI tools, mainly for administrative tasks. She recommended building foundational AI literacy, supporting workplace AI policies, and developing a national training strategy for the creative sector, all within an ethical framework.
Marie-Christine Morin and Sven Buridans of the Fédération culturelle canadienne-française said the cultural sector is absent from AI funding and policy working groups. They asked for federal investments to support francophone arts and culture, training AI models in French with community-specific data, and cross-departmental collaboration to make innovation programs accessible.
Kevin Chan and Rachel Curran of Meta Platforms Inc. said AI model training does not implicate copyright because it extracts unprotectable patterns, not protected expression. They advocated for open-source AI and regulating the use of technology rather than the technology itself, and expressed hope for renewed discussions on news content under Bill C-18.
The committee agreed to add two more meetings to the study. Parties will submit updated witness lists by the end of the week, with a focus on hearing from sectors not yet represented, such as video game creators and digital artists.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors; verify against the official evidence.